← Back to Featured Work

Engineering Tooling

EVAGIX

Claims → local evidence → deterministic findings.

Validates repository claims and agent-facing guidance against local evidence, producing deterministic findings for developers and CI.

  • Developer Tooling
  • Evidence Validation
  • Agent Context
  • CI
  • Reliability
EVAGIX

Problem

Repository documentation and agent-facing instructions can drift away from the code and configuration they describe, creating false confidence for developers, CI, and coding agents.

Approach

  • Collects repository-local evidence from documentation, manifests, workflows, configuration, command definitions, and agent-facing context.
  • Validates claims and guidance with deterministic rules, repository policy, and explicit evidence boundaries rather than treating prose as trusted truth.
  • Produces reviewable findings through CLI, JSON, SARIF, and CI-friendly outputs while remaining local-first and dependency-light.

Signals & Results

  • Validation evidence: tested across 100+ repositories spanning diverse technology stacks.
  • Published Python CLI with PyPI distribution, CI, documentation, security guidance, and JSON / SARIF outputs.
  • Explicit scope boundary: static repository evidence complements tests, code review, SAST, secret scanning, and runtime verification rather than replacing them.

Stack

  • Python
  • CLI
  • pytest
  • GitHub Actions
  • SARIF
  • JSON

Project media

EVAGIX validating repository claims against local evidence EVAGIX validating repository claims against local evidence
← Back to Featured Work